Showing posts with label PM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PM. Show all posts

Friday, June 13, 2014

Frustrating Outcome Of Wage Talk

Bank wage talks resume after 3 months -Hindu Business Line

Kochi, June 13:  
The long-term wage-settlement negotiations between the trade unions in the banking sector and the Indian Banks Association, which got stalled during the last lap of the Manmohan Singh Government, have resumed.
 
On Friday, the IBA functionaries held talks with the leaders of the United Forum of Bank Unions, representing a large number of trade unions in public sector and private sector banks. The last round of talks between the UFBU and the IBA, along with Finance Ministry officials, was held on March 14.
 
However, Friday’s talks ended inclusively, UFBU leaders told Business Line. At the talks, held in Mumbai, the IBA upped its offer of wage rise from the earlier 10 per cent to 11.
 
But, the UFBU insisted that there should at least be 25 per cent increase in the ‘pay slip component’ of the bank staff. The IBA rejected the demand outright and the talks ended inconclusively without setting a date for the next round of talks.
 
Leaders said this was the first time that the UFBU had put figure to figure their demand for wage rise. But, the IBA functionaries’ offer had not come anywhere near the unions’ demand.
However, union leaders feel that now that a new Government is in place at the Centre, the IBA will substantially improve its offer in the next round of talks. The IBA needs the Finance Ministry’s nod for making an improved offer.
 
Link Hindu Business Line
BY  Dhruba Debnath    -----BLACK FRIDAY FOR BANKERS!!!!

Today's meeting again proved we have a long struggle & fight for an ideal WAGE.I like other bankers became quite disheaertened after reading some of my friends post of 11% offer.This seems that we are no more a white collared employees as if we are being treated like MANREGA workers whose wages are being increased by existing GOVT.like what IBA offered with 1% increase from their previous offer which they too were offering before the elections.

 If we see from the side of IBA whatever offer they had made till today on looking at the balance sheets of some of our struggling PSU banks,whose balance sheet are not in a position of shedding out 10% towards wage for the employees.

 It doesn't mean that I am too acting like the puppet of IBA.According to sources whatever I had heard before the submission of "CHARTER OF DEMANDS",where IBA had already offered to our UFBU leaders that demand of min.40-50% offer was acceptable to them if they allow the old proposal of MOF "MERGERS".

 The above proposal of "MERGERS"which was rejected by the UFBU and they oppose the same till today.

 My dear friends I dont think myself an enriched economist or an experienced banker but whatever today I am expressing is all the frustration which I think you all are feeling after almost 18 months.
1)UFBU will always oppose "MERGERS"because it will bring an end to their luxury time.


 2)MERGERS will reduce the existing numbers of GS,AGS,Executive Members of each & every banks enjoying the best postings in their tenure.

 3)MERGERS will immediately force them transferred to far away places because some of them are enjoying those postings for >7 years(approx.)
I do agree that MERGERS might give a set back to employees of loosing one increment but I think that atleast by shedding one increment we can get a better pay hike.
If we can shed our hard earned salaries for stupid 2 days strike which resulted in 11% hike in todays meeting.


 I think we the existing staff can happily welcome "MERGERS" because already we are in the deadline and somehow its not know but in next settlement we have to get ourselves merged with other BANKS.
During 90s there was huge opposition from this UFBU regarding Computerisation but finally we are working in that environment.


 4)MERGERS will bring quality in our work environment where we will get our respect back which we dont have in the society.
5)Branch Managers dont have to fight for GOVT.DEPOSITS,sorry not fight its begging for a cheque from the 10th pass babu working in GOVT DEPT.


 6) Competition of retaining NO.1 POSITION locally among other PSUs will vanish & this will help us to compete with other GLOBAL BANKS at International Level.(still we the INDIAN BANKS are strong as per our tight norms like BASEL 3)


MY DEAR FRIENDS I WOULD SUGGEST THAT PLEASE DONT GO & SUPPORT ON STUPID 1-2 DAYS STRIKE CALLED BY OUR THINKERS UFBU.
ITS TIME NOW WE SHOULD OPPOSE THIS &FORCE OUR LAST & EXISTING LEADERS TO GIVE US A RESPECT IN THE SOCIETY.
WE HAVE TO ACCEPT THE FACT THAT XTH BIPARTITE WILL NOT FETCH A BETTER PAY BUT IT MAY FETCH A BETTER PAY FOR TO BE RETIRED LEADERS ON SOME BETTERMENT IN THEIR PENSION SYSTEM.

 I MAY BE NOT LIKED BY ALL BUT SORRY I CANT CONTROL MY FRUSTRATIONS ANYMORE…..
STILL A HOPE IS THERE THAT ONE DAY TIME WILL COME WHEN WE WILL GET BACK OUR LOST DIGNITY…..

WAGE REVISION- Xth BI-PARTITE SETTLEMENT:
BY JSOMA SHEKARA

(I.B.A.) improved their offer from earlier 10% to 11 % which UNITED FORUM OF BANK UNIONS ...( U.F.B.U.) rejected.Since detailed circular has not come it would be improper to comment about it. However detailed circular will have only minor additional details like heading of Union reporting it and name of the person signing it.Everything else will be same as reported perviously.


1. To day nothing has been discussed. It must be noted that during Feb meeting itself IBA has asked how much wage hike UFBU is expecting. At that time UFBU did not gave any specific reply.
2. UFBU also has not asked IBA if not 25% how much wage hike IBA is ready to agree. Both could have arrived at some figure between 11% and 25% viz. 15% or 17%. So that UFBU could move on to other major demands like Pension Updation etc.
3. It is not clear since there is stalemate on wage revision, whether UFBU has taken up Pensioners issues in to day's meeting. Was Pensioners issues brought in Feb and Mar to chat on something and spend time as Election Code was in force?
4. Next meeting will be scheduled for some where in August and again IBA will improve its offer by 0.50% or 1% and UFBU will reject to be discussed in next meeting.
Had UFBU leaders were serious before attending meeting they would have met FM and requested him to issue guidelines to IBA to finish BPS in a short time.
We do not find any UFBUs writ in negotiations. They will just attend meeting and report IBA has said this said that we did not agree.

JSOMA SHEKARA

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Work Culture In Banks

PM’s call to improve work culture extends to banking sector-Hindu Business Line

K RAM KUMAR


Must submit ‘action taken report’ within five days
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s fiat to Central ministries and departments to ensure “improved work culture and work environment” has been extended to all financial sector regulators, chiefs of public sector banks, financial institutions and public sector insurance companies.
Initiate immediate action


In a communication issued on Monday to the above-mentioned entities, the Finance Ministry said they are required to initiate immediate action to improve work culture and work environment in all their offices, branches, premises or “any other spaces” in their organisation.
However, the ministry has given the regulators and financial intermediaries only five days to submit their ‘action taken report’ (by June 13), so that the Cabinet Secretary can be apprised of the action taken.
As part of this exercise, the ministry wants the workspace cleared and spruced up and filed/papers neatly stacked so that a positive work environment is created.
The financial sector regulators and financial intermediaries are required to identify forms that are in vogue and shorten them to one page.
They should also encourage online submission of information and eventually universalise it.
Decision-making


For quick turnaround in decisions, the ministry said decision-making layers should be whittled down to a maximum of four.
Calling for collaborative decision-making and frequent consultations between various verticals in an organisation, the ministry underscored that the entire organisation should work as a team, with every level being encouraged to provide inputs and value-addition.
The regulators as well as the financial intermediaries have been asked to ensure effective and timely resolution of public grievances.
In the case of financial sector regulators, the ministry wants them to identify at least 10 rules or processes and even archaic laws, which are redundant and not lead to any loss of efficiency, so that they can be repealed.

There are five financial sector regulators — Reserve Bank of India, Securities and Exchange Board of India, Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority, Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority, and Forward Markets Commission — in the country.

Monday, June 9, 2014

Merger Of RRBs (Regional Rural Banks)

FinMin puts amalgamation of regional rural banks on hold

At present, central govt, state govts and sponsor banks like SBI and PNB provide capital                          




     RRBs were set up in 1975, to create an alternative channel to the cooperative credit structure and ensure sufficient institutional credit for the rural and agriculture sectors

The Centre has put on hold further amalgamation of regional rural banks (RRBs), as these face challenges in meeting capital adequacy norms. It is expected the focus will now be on improving their performance and exploring a new class of investors to raise capital for these.

In a communiqué to the heads of public sector banks, the finance ministry said there was a need to tap other sources of capital for RRBs. No fresh proposal of amalgamation of RRBs should be taken up, it added.


Currently, the central and state governments and sponsor banks such as State Bank of India and Punjab National Bankprovide capital to RRBs — while the Centre provides 50 per cent, the state government provides 15 per cent and the sponsor bank 35 per cent. While Centre and sponsor banks have been infusing capital, state governments have been found wanting in providing their share.

A Bill to amend the RRB Act is being considered by the parliamentary standing committee on finance. The amendments are aimed at increasing the pool of investors to tap capital for RRBs.

A senior public sector official said now, the focus would be on improving the performance of RRBs, including their profitability. Further amalgamation on this front should happen only after examining the viability of the exercise, the official added.
As of March-end, 2011, the total number of RRBs stood at 82; this fell to 64 in March 2013 and 57 in March 2014.
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (Nabard), the regulating body for rural banks, has said agricultural credit disbursement by RRBs has been short of the target. The low disbursal of farm credit by RRBs was due to amalgamation and capital adequacy limitations, as these banks had to maintain a capital adequacy ratio of at least nine per cent, it said, adding RRBs didn’t have any source of capital other than paid-up capital.

RRBs were set up in 1975, to create an alternative channel to the cooperative credit structure and ensure sufficient institutional credit for the rural and agriculture sectors.

RRBs have presence throughout the country. P Chidambaram during his first innings as finance minister under United Progressive Alliance (UPA) took steps including recapitalization, and restructuring to improve the functioning and financial health. It was also meant to attain economies of scale and ensure better managerial control.