Thursday, July 4, 2013

New Pension Scheme Challenged In Court

Writ petition against SBI's new pension scheme posted for July 15

VINSON KURIAN

The Kerala High Court has posted a writ petition against implementation of New Pension Scheme in State Bank of India for July 15.
The writ, filed by A. Jayakumar, General Secretary, State Banks’ Staff Union (Kerala Circle), came up for hearing before Justice C.T. Ravikumar on Monday.
George Thomas Mevada, counsel appearing for the bank, said the pension scheme was framed in consultation with Reserve Bank and with prior approval of Government of India.
He said a proposal in this regard was sent to the Centre for its approval and necessary action.
Counsel appearing for the Centre said details had been sought from authorities with regard to the implementation of the scheme in the bank.
Details would be presented before the court within a week’s time.
Recording the submission made by counsel for the Centre, the court directed them to furnish details in writing as regards the date of tabling of the scheme before both houses of Parliament and its passage with modifications, if any.
Date of its notification in the Gazette of India in compliance with section 50(4) of SBI Act should also be clarified.
Counsel was further directed to hand over copies of such details to the petitioner and the bank on or before July 8.

The union was represented S. Vaidyanathan, H. Ganapathy and Jimmy George.

Rollout of New Pension Scheme in SBI challenged

VINSON KURIAN
The High Court of Kerala has admitted a writ petition filed by State Banks’ Staff Union (Kerala) to quash implementation of the New Pension Scheme (NPS) in State Bank of India.
The writ also prayed for directions to revert those recruited on or after August 1, 2010, back to existing pension scheme.

HEARING POSTED

Justice P. N. Ravindran has posted the case for further hearing after a month.
The interim order directed that amounts contributed by employees towards the pension fund be kept in a separate account and maintained with the trustee bank.
The case was filed by A. Jayakumar, General Secretary of State Banks’ Staff Union, Kerala Circle.
The petitioner recalled that NPS was implemented as part of the industry-level 9{+t}{+h} bipartite wage settlement.
As per this, Defined Contribution Pension Scheme (DCPS)/NPS would apply to those joining services on or after April 1, 2010.
But this settlement between Indian Banks’ Association and unions of other banks would not apply to SBI, the petitioner contended. This is because the bank was not party to this settlement insofar as pension-related matters were concerned.
But central board of SBI on November 8, 2010, decided that all employees joining in permanent scale on or after August 1, 2010, shall be offered only the benefit of DCPS.
The SBI Act did not empower the central board to amend pension fund rules, and that too with retrospective effect, it was contended.

PARLIAMENT NOD

The SBI Act also makes it clear that any regulation framed in this manner will have to be laid before Parliament.
It will take effect in the existing or modified form as decided by both the Houses of Parliament only.
In the present case, the central board has taken a unilateral decision to modify the pension scheme.
Legal recourse was also being sought on grounds that the pension scheme once framed cannot be modified without issuing notice.

No comments:

Post a Comment