Showing posts with label Bank Officer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bank Officer. Show all posts

Saturday, July 5, 2014

Are Trade Union Leaders Honestly Active And Effective In Bank?

Bank employees are eagerly waiting for wage revision which is due since November 2012. There are other several issues which need the attention of those who are said to be well wisher of bank staff.

There is practically no stagnation for central government employees as per last pay commission recommendation and as accepted by government of India. Why is there stagnation in pay scale meant for only bank employees particularly when bank is not in a position to accommodate so many candidates in higher scale due to their own constraints and when there are fewer vacancies?

For none of fault of senior officers, they are denied not only promotions but also annual increment.

When banks do not find such senior officers for promotions, bank should not hesitate in accepting resignation of such officers and allow full pension and retirement benefits. But there is no justification for stopping annual increment. By denying increments to all, bank management is creating anomalies in pension payments too. An employee who worked for 30 years and an employee who worked for 40 years will get almost same amount of pension if they leave the bank. In near future even an employee who worked for  20 years to 25 years will get higher pension who have been serving bank for more than 30 to 35 years. It is important to note that pension is calculated maximum for 33 years of service even if an employee has worked for 40 years.

Officers who have transferred from outside states to North East States were getting so many incentives as per 1984 circular or as guidelines of IBA as prevalent for central government employees working in other sectors in eighties. Why these incentives have not been revised during last 25 years?

Special allowance fixed Rs.1200/ or Rs.1500/ for specified area is common for all staff posted in North East region. What about additional benefits for those who are transferred from other states to North East?

For outsiders, there was a provision of Rs.1500. p.m. in 1984 when Rs.1500/ was a significant amount compared to prevailing scale of pay for officers at that time. Now even that Rs.1500/ (it should be at least 10000 in view of price rise and scale rise during last 25 years) or 12.5% of pay has been abolished.

Originally North East posting policy was framed for enthusing employees to serve in north eastern based branches for two years and then they were given preferred posting. Unfortunately this holy policy is now misused by greedy and corrupt executives to sideline good officers from their path of earning illegal money and golden gifts.

Incentives of preferred and choice posting to employees who served North east branches for two years also stands snatched. Preferred posting after completion of two years tenure also lies on the mercy of top officials. There is no shame feeling in the minds of ED or top executives when they  violate the existing policy or misuse the same in the name of bank’s exigencies.

After all management of PS banks know that Indian judiciary cannot decide the case even in two to three decades. And they also know the art of delaying hearing on court cases associated with bank employees’ promotion or posting or payment. They also know the art of buying trade union leaders or building pressure on trade union leaders so that they may reconcile with whims of top officials of management.
God knows what union leaders are doing?

There are lacs of bank employees who are continuously working in rural areas for one or two decades or even more. On the other hand there are  lacs of bank employees who are continuously posted in Metros and Urban areas. Unfortunately only a section of employees are facing frequent transfers from one corner to the other corner of the country.

God knows l what union leaders are doing?

Answer is that trade union leaders are also standing in the same que in which a team of flatterers are standing to get maximum benefit from higher bosses, cream posting, reckless earning through credit lending or waiver of loan without any fear of action from higher bosses and get preferred promotions for their flatterer members if they so like.


It is therefore better to say All is Well sir, No problem sir, everything will be o.k. sir, I am there don't worry, I will manage it, I will manage media people, I will manage CBI people and so on. These wordings are a few permanent wording of flatterers.

In past , several writ petitions have been filed against arbitrary promotion of some officers and whimsical denial to some others. Several cases have been filed in the past for injustice and corrupt practices carried out in recruitment. Cases have also been filed against whimsical changes every year undertaken by bank management in promotion policies merely to suit the candidates of their choices. But none of such cases could reach the final judgement. 

Even the cases pertaining to historic injustice in recovery of money from bank staff for giving them 2nd option of pension filed in various High courts are languishing for last four to five years only because petitioner cannot afford spending lacs of rupees whereas bank management sacrifice crores of rupees on advocates in abortion of such court cases which may expose their involvement in  corruption  . Trade Union leaders who worked in nexus with top officials of management in arriving at agreement on lines dictated by government of India and IBA in IX Bipartite settlement are almost playing the role of management so far as suppression of interest of bank staff is concerned.


A few executives by using their mobile phones using some flatterer Branch Managers to extend credit to unscrupulous borrowers and sacrificing huge amount in compromise and waiver of loan scheme just to earn some illegal money and quicker promotions.

Banks assets worth thousands and thousands of crores of rupees are locked and lost in bad borrowers every year whereas government of India, RBI and all regulating agencies remain silent spectators.

People have seen how NPA rose 500% during last few  years in Public Sector Bank but regulating agencies are not ready to accept that health of these bank will deteriorate in future . There is in fact none to bell the cat.



Friday, June 20, 2014

More Clarity On 11th Round Of Wage Talk

AIUBOSA CIR GS: 186 / 2013-14 dated 18.06.2014 


ALL INDIA UNION BANK OFFICER STAFF ASSOCIATION 
(Affiliated to AIBOA) 
Phone: 9381036405 / 9791027140 
Email: dsganeshanaiboa@gmail.com : dsganesanubi@gmail.com 
 Address: Don Flats, I Floor, No.19, SRP Colony 7th
 Street, Peravallur, 
Chennai 600082 

Cir.No.GS:186 / 2013 - 14 18.06.2014 

To All Officers 

Dear comrades 

WAGE REVISION TALKS – 11TH ROUND. 10% ON 10% IS THE REVISED OFFER. CONSENSUS DEMAND OF 25% ON PAYSLIP COMPONENTS PLACED. 

We are reproducing AIBOA’s circular No.8:VI:2014 dated 14.06.2014 on the subject for information and circulation among other officers. 

After a lapse of nearly three months (i.e. last meeting was held on 14 3 2014), 
eleventh round of discussion on wage revision was held at Mumbai with IBA participated by the eleven unions. 

2. Preceding the talks, UFBU Constituents met to draw the future course of action in the background of change of Government at the Centre after the 16th
 Lok Sabha Elections. The meeting observed two minutes silence to pay respect to the departed soul of Com Shanti Patel, HMS Leader, Port and Dock Workers Federation, Former Mayor of Mumbai and past Rajya Sabha MP too. 

3. While noting the developments on account of submission of P J Nayak Committee report, Government proposed moves of dilution of equity from the present level up to 58%, merger of PS Banks on account of huge bad loans and altogether aiming to attack the Public Sector character of the Banking Industry were debated. A reference about the participation of five 
unions AIBOA, AIBEA, BEFI, INBEF and INBOC in a demonstration on 23/5/2014 against the RBI on P J Nayak Committee recommendations was also made. The meeting after due deliberation came to a unanimous conclusion to send a congratulatory communication to 
Hon’ble Prime Minister , and also to lead a delegation to the Hon’ble Finance Minister to present our view points on Banking Industry and also the inordinate delay on wage revision of the work force. 

It was further decided to pick up the thread of discussion from the stage where it was left on 14/3/2014 negotiations. 

4. Exactly at noon, the negotiation team was led by Chairman, Negotiating Team, Sri TM Bhasin, Sri. R.K Dubey CMD Canara Bank, Sri Rajeev Rishi CMD Central Bank of India, Sri AIUBOSA CIR GS: 186 / 2013-14 dated 18.06.2014 
Rakesh Sethi, CMD Allahabad Bank, Sri M V Tanksale, CEO, IBA Sri Unnikrishnan DY CEO, besides the executives of HR backup team of IBA. 

5. The Chairman IBA Negotiating team presented the developments in the last ten rounds spreading over a period of 19 months in a brief way and concluded that the Net Profit has dwindled substantially in March 2014 and staff cost has gone up substantially during the last year. In view of the practical restrictions, on account of bad loans etc., it would not be possible to offer beyond 10% on pay slip component. On our insistence to know the 
developments on the issues raised in the last round, it was supplemented further by IBA CEO Sri M V Tanksale, which are as follows. 

[A] 5 Days working: The present Government thinking to revert to 6 days working in Government, forces not to pursue the issue further with the Government. 

[B] Regulated Working Hours: Officers’ Unions are to submit their concrete view points to IBA. 

[C] Pension related Issues: 100% DA Neutralization and improvement in Family Pension are finding favour from Government point of view, however expressed their reservation on updation of pension due to substantial cost involved. 

[D] Compassionate ground Appointments: The favourable decision from the Government is awaited within a couple of months. 

[E] Improvement on Hospitalisation Expenses: IBA reiterated that the scheme provided by them should be considered by the Union. A letter of reassurance from the service provider was also given to the Unions on the negotiation table. 

6. Representatives of the IBA reiterated that the Unions should spell out their quantum demand in the background of non-conceding any of the proposal presented by IBA to Unions. It was Com K K Nair, Chairman UFBU who broke the news of the earlier offer of IBA of 11% elsewhere, in turn, it was readily agreed to offer 11% with a condition to close the negotiations forthwith. 

After couple of minutes of consultations amongst the constituent Unions, it was expressed clearly that on Pay slip Component 25% increase was placed before IBA Negotiating Team. 

The negotiating team, while expressing their un-acceptance with force, abruptly folded up the discussions. 

The light at the end of the tunnel is certainly not visible. 
S NAGARAJAN / GENERAL SECRETARY / AIBOA 
With Greetings, 
Yours Comradely, 

 (D.S. GANESAN) 
General Secretary 

More Insight Into Talks Held on 14th June 2014-- By National Union of Bank Employees-Presented in Allbankingsolutions.com by Sri Rajesh Goyal

We have received the following circular from Mr Sankaran Srinivasan, President of NUBE.  The circular No is 05/2014 and is dated 14th June, 2014, and  has been issued by Mr L. BALASUBRAMANIAN,  General Secretary of NUBE.  We are uploading the full circular as it appears to be more authentic and transparent then what we have heard a stereo-typed  statement by UFBU.   It gives more insight about what is the total amount of Establishment Expenses and What is the total amount of  Pay Slip Component. (We have added the colours to focus on major issues)

Dear Comrades,

MEETING WITH IBA ON WAGE REVISION TALKS

Having won absolute majority in the Lok Sabha, the new NDA Government pronounced that its cabinet will prepare a list of issues that they will take up in the first 100 days in office, with a focus on efficiency, delivery systems and implementation.  In consonance  with this vision & mission of the new Government, Bank employees, whose wage revision is due from 1-11-2012, were  anxiously expecting a decent wage hike once the negotiations resumes. 

 Bank employees and public welcomed the priorities set by the Finance Minster to arrest   Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) menace which is depleting the healthy profits earned by the Banks which is estimated at over Rs.2 lakh crore.  There were reports that the Finance Minister is weighing various options such as shifting the Bank NPAs to asset reconstruction companies on a wider scale, and sweeping changes in the Debt Recovery Tribunal's (DRT) legislation, making the dispensation of cases time-bound.  And Bank employees were awaiting good days for Banks and employees ahead with the Government showing willingness for wage revision for which the new dispensation at the centre assured during the election campaign. 

 Yes, “good days” have indeed come for some. But “bad days” have befallen to the Bank employees. The meeting of 13th June 2014 turned to be yet another futile, symbolic meeting with the yawning gulf separating policy pronouncements from the ground reality.  Thus the 10th Industry-wide Bipartite Wage Settlement negotiations in the Banking sector have dragged on for more than one-and-a-half years now without making much headway.
 After a gap of 3 months with the last negotiations held on 14-3-2014 which was especially for non-monetary issues raised by the unions, anotheround of discussions took place with IBA on 13-6-2014 in Mumbai.  As usual, all the eleven unions have participated in this round also, with the undersigned representing NUBE.
IBA informed, profits of the Banks have come down as on 31-3-2014 and therefore they can offer maximum of 11% (increase of meager 1% our emphasis!on the cost ofPay Slip components of the wage bill which would amount to Rs.3,465 crores and which would be exclusive of other costs on retirement benefits, LFC, hospitalizationexpenses, etc Since negotiating unions rejected the  offer of 11% increaseIBA wanted to know thexpectation of the union.  A representative of the umbrella of nine unions informed that their minimum expectation i25% increase in the Pay Slip components cost.
It is pertinent to mention here that NUBE was the only union which while submitting its exhaustive charter of demands of 102 pages  for tenth bipartite as early as 16-06-2012 itself, with justifications apriori demanded  45%  over  all increase  on the establishment cost which works to 26.5% (Rs.8348 Crores ) in pay slip costs.  
IBA expressed their total inability to accept the same ait ibeyond the paying capacity of the Banks. This stubborn stand of IBA is preposterous and is unacceptable to NUBE in view of the following reasons:

  1. In all the previous settlements salary increase was given a load to total establishment expenses.  In this wage negotiations we have been offered on fixed pay components.  As against the total establishment expenses  of Rs.56292 crores  the pay slip component is only Rs.31503 crores

  1. While offer of 11% on establishment cost will work out to Rs.6192 crores, 11% of pay slips components expenses will amount to a measly figure of Rs.3465 crores only.  Hence the offer of IBA   for one million Bank employees is far below the amount offered during last bipartite settlement.


  1. The first round of negotiations started only on 22-02-2013. During this 15 month period  Gross  non-performing assets (NPAs) of 40 listed Banks shot up by 35.2% or Rs.63,386 crore for the nine months ending December 2013 to cross the Rs.2.4 lakh crore mark. This jump of 35.2% was higher than the 27% rise witnessed in the first six months of the current financial year according to a study done by NPA source.com, a portal which focuses on resolution of assets.  Even if an infinitesimal of 1.83% of these NPA is recovered in tune with the policy plan of the present Finance Minster is expedited with all the seriousness, the demand of the union can be easily met without increase in the exchequer. If amount due from  four largest willful defaulters which is around Rs.9384 crores, is recovered with all sincerity, it  is enough to meet the demand of the unions without any burden  and  the so called capacity to pay peddled by the  IBA will fall flat on four  legs.  The unions will be ever willing to support IBA/ government if it initiates appropriate steps.

  1. It is pertinent to note that the 11% of pay-slip is not in consonance with the prevailing wages of comparable concerns.  This is contrary to the views expressed in the Sastri Tribunal.  Hence demand of the Bank employees for ensuring parity with Government employees / comparable institutions in fair just and right.

5.  Even with 25% hike we will be just inching towards some semblance of parity with pay of government employees if we evaluate the projected salary in anvil in the wake of 7th Pay Commission.

On other issues
  
The only silver lining in the meeting was that IBA is favourably inclined to consider demand of extending 100% DA neutralization to all pensioners.  IBA also seems to have shown positive response to improvement in Family Pension. However, unions still need to do lot of work as IBA has not committed anything and only shown positive response.   Thus, a ray of hope continues for pre2002 retired Bank employees for 100% DA. As regards updation of pension, IBAhaoutlined it involves substantial financial burden to the Bank.This means in all sectors, including central and state Govt., whenever there is an industry wise wage increase, pension will also be increased. In Banking sector it is not so. Hence a G.M retired 10 years back is drawing less pension than a clerk retiring now  IBonce again reiterated that oudemand for extending appointment on compassionate grounds in the Banks on thlines ofGovernment schemis under thactivand positive consideration of thGovernment and their decision iawaited. Needless to underscore here that proposal agreed between unions and IBA is pending with Govt.  for considerable period of time, therefore brooks no further delay.
Regarding Improvement of Hospitalisation Expenses, IBA reiterated that the scheme provided by them should be considered by the Union.  A letter of reassurance from the service provider was also given to the Unions on the negotiation table.

On the issue of five days week, IBA said that looking to the approach of the new government at the centre for more working hours, it is not possible for them to pursue the issue any further.
 Comrades,

 The preposterous, stubborn stand of IBA has shattered our hopes and battered our dreams of an early settlement.   The entire workforce  have felt the insult inflicted by IBA, who failed to live upto the expressions made by IBA Chairman in the first round of discussions held on 22-03-2013  that “the settlement would be concluded at the earliest with reasonable, respectable and comparable wage revision compared with external factors”.
 We should take a call on these adverse developments in Toto and chalk out further agitational programmes of higher form to seize 10th Bipartite Wage Revisions from the unyielding hands, no holds barred.
 Let us March forward!
 Yours Comradely,
  
GENERAL SECRETARY"
NATIONAL UNION OF BANK EMPLOYEES
Administrative Office: 763, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.E-Mail: unionbalu@yahoo.co.in,   gsnube@gmail.com  Phone : 044-28523392 / 28523561

Comments By AllBankingSolutions.com

I really appreciate the efforts of NUBE in taking Aam Banker into confidence as to what is the ground realities.    Such sharing of information helps in confidence building in the cadre.    It is good idea to be more transparent.  The above circular has given insight as to the fact that the offer of IBA of 11% increase on Pay Slip component is in fact equal to 6.15% on the Establishment Expenses component.   Thus, now cat is out of the bag that IBA is merely offering an increase of 6.15% when compared with the increases in the previous BPS.   In fact an increase of 25% of the Pay Slip component will tantamount to only increase of less than 14% on establishment expenses.   Thus bankers should realise the ground realities that even if IBA agrees to the demands of UFBU, your increase may not match to what you got in the previous BPS !!

Saturday, June 14, 2014

Bad HR Bad Culture Bad Asset Bad Borrower

My Opinion on formation of NAMC  or ARC or Suggestion to Government for take over of bad loans are as follows..

Clever officials of public sector banks are silent on causes of bad debts. They do not want CBI inquiry to find out whether there was any corruption involved. They want that government should take over bad loans so that they may get fresh opportunity of earning bribe and costly gifts in lieu of fresh sanction of loans. If bad loans are takeover by Government or transferred to proposed National Asset Management company or sold to ARC, this will lead to bad culture and bankers will feel exonerated from all future charges and without any hesitation indulge in more and more corruption.

It is remarkable to point out here that after the introduction of loan waiver culture by politicians like Devi Lal and VP Singh and then perpetuated and promoted by all subsequent government , borrowers have willfully and strategically become  careless in repayment of loans . Borrowers willfully delay in repayment in anticipation of loan waiver scheme by the government or settlement offer by management of bank. Borrowers with malicious intention of grabbing bank's money first turn defaulters and then pray for compromise and sacrifice.

Again it is good and desirable  to point out here that businessmen whose trade promotes black money also willfully and intentionally  evade tax payment in anticipation of Voluntary Income Disclosure scheme offer by the government.Once government start punishing tax defaulters and tax evaders , instance of tax evasion and creation of black money automatically get reduced. Once terror is pushed into the mind of evil doers , the habit of indulging in bad practices will end .

As long as government do not take stern action against erring borrowers, erring bankers , erring officials, erring businessmen , erring politicians and professionals, we may not dream of good governance and honest culture. People commit crime and wait for exoneration by manipulation. Honesty is no more a good policy. 

Dishonesy, flattery and manipulatory tactics are the tools which helps in acquisition of power, money and social status which not only helps criminals getting rid of punishment but also ultimately lead to success at the cost of really good performers .

Scam occurs in implementation of almost all schemes , all projects and all departmental works. Whenever scams are exposed, government change the name of policy , set up a committee to suggest new name of policy and finally exonerate all evil doers . Similarly bankers first created and accumulated bad loans and now when they are exposed the want government to takeover bad loans. They suggest government to absolve them from the lens of CBI and CVC.

I do not say all bad loans are due to evil intention of loan sanctioning officials .^There may be some cases of default due to genuine reasons too.  But what I mean to say that whenever there is doubt  of evil motivated loaning, there must be through investigation and if malicious intention is proved beyond doubt  , the officials must be punished to teach lesson to others and to pave way for good governance.

I have no doubt in saying that present and decade long  dirty culture rampant in banking and other government offices helps in further promotion of dirty culture. Therefore government will have to learn punishing evil doers. And once the punishment is awarded to evil doers, none will dare commit crime in future and good culture will replace bad culture for ever. I do not want to promote reign of terror but I want that good performers must be given due respect if India has to grow in real sense.


Bankers seek bad loan takeover-Hindustan Times
India’s top financial sector executives on Tuesday asked the government to set up a national behemoth that would consolidate bad loans to clean up bank balance sheets, more tax breaks to encourage household savings and sale of stakes in Life Insurance Corp (LIC) by listing it on exchanges

"There were some suggestions on setting up of 'National Asset Management Company'," financial services secretary GS Sandhu said after the pre-budget meeting with heads of banks and financial institutions with finance minister Arun Jaitley.

Bankers also asked the government to raise the exemption limit under Section 80C of the Income Tax Act from the current Rs. 1 lakh, which has remained unchanged for a decade and its real value has declined sharply.

The proposed Asset Management Company will take over large non-performing assets (NPAs) of banks and help in reviving companies ridden with bad debts.

Gross NPAs — shorthand for loans that could turn bad — of Indian banks have soared from Rs. 69,000 crore in 2009 to an estimated Rs. 2.8 lakh crore as on March 31, 2014. Between October and March, an estimated Rs. 60,000 crore of bad assets — about 15-20% of overall NPAs of banks — came up for sale, which is almost four-times of last year’s level.

"There was discussion on NPAs. There was also proposal for setting up of National Asset Management Company for improving the performance of DRTs (debt recovery tribunals) to collect loans," HSBC India country head Naina Lal Kidwai said after the two-and-half hour long meeting.

Suggestions were also made for strengthening of present SARFAESI Act (Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act) to ensure fast recovery of bad loans, she said.

Kotak Mahindra Bank managing director Uday Kotak said the government should consider listing of insurance behemoth LIC over the next few years. "Over the next few yeas the government should seriously consider listing of LIC. The kind of money government can raise by listing LIC is significant, it can fund financial needs of public sector banks as well as fiscal deficit," he said.

"This necessarily need not be in July Budget, but over the next few years. Listing of LIC may be a game changer in financial sector."

Public sector banks requested government for capital infusion and long-term instrument for financing infrastructure sector

Friday, June 13, 2014

Suggested Promotion Policy

THE IDEAL PROMOTION PROCESS
Suggested by V Subramanian 

The Ideal Promotion Process - Merit Quota
S No
Evaluation Criteria/Stage
Maximum Marks
Minimum Marks
Explanation
1
Academic Qualifications
10
N I L
Graduation: 2 Marks; Post Graduation: 2 Marks; Professional Qualification: 2 Marks; JAIIB - 1 Mark & CAIIB - 3 Marks (Professional Qualifications include ACA, ICWA, CFA, MBA, LLB/BL, Company Secretaryship etc.)
2
Experience in the current Grade/Scale
6
3
1 Mark for each completed year of service in the present Grade/Scale
3
Performance Appraisal
24
15
Last 3 years average is to be reckoned, in order to eliminate the evil effects of subjectivity, bias, favourtism and nepotism.  However, the employee/officer concerned must have worked under not less than 2 appraising officials during the period of reckoning.
4
Managerial Experience
6
4
2 marks per year of managerial experience in the entire banking career
5
Out of State Service
4
N I L
1 mark per year of service outside one's home state in the entire banking career
6
Written Test
40
24
The written test must comprise of only questions suiting the present grade/scale of each staff.  Neither very simple and basic questions are to be asked, nor very complex subjects are to be touched.
7
Interview
10
4
During the interview process, stupid, silly and irritating questions are not to be posed.  Similarly, very simple, superficial and irrelevant questions are to be avoided.  At present, the nature of questions varies depending on the candidate concerned to select or disqualify a person.  This must change.

T O T A L
100
50
The overall minimum marks to qualify will be 50 out of 100.





The Ideal Promotion Process - Seniority Quota

S No
Evaluation Criteria/Stage
Maximum Marks
Minimum Marks
Explanation

1
Academic Qualifications
10
N I L
Graduation: 2 Marks; Post Graduation: 2 Marks; Professional Qualification: 2 Marks; JAIIB - 1 Mark & CAIIB - 3 Marks (Professional Qualifications include ACA, ICWA, CFA, MBA, LLB/BL, Company Secretaryship etc.)

2
Experience in the current Grade/Scale
20
10
2 Marks for each completed year of service in the present Grade/Scale

3
Performance Appraisal
30
21
Last 5 years average is to be reckoned, in order to eliminate the evil effects of subjectivity, bias, favourtism and nepotism.  However, the employee/officer concerned must have worked under not less than 2 appraising officials during the period of reckoning.

4
Managerial Experience
10
N I L
2 marks per year of managerial experience in the entire banking career

5
Out of State Service
10
N I L
2 marks per year of service outside one's home state in the entire banking career

6
Rural/Semi-Urban Service
10
6
2 Marks for each completed year of service in the entire banking career

7
Interview
10
3
During the interview process, stupid, silly and irritating questions are not to be posed.  Similarly, very simple, superficial and irrelevant questions are to be avoided.  At present, the nature of questions varies depending on the candidate concerned to select or disqualify a person.  This must change.


T O T A L
100
40
However, the overall minimum marks to qualify will be 50 out of 100.

Note
Common to both the Streams - Merit and Seniority

Vacancies in positions up to MMGS II can be filled up as follows.

Direct Recruitment
20%


Promotions under Merit Quota
50%


Promotions under Seniority Quota
30%


Vacancies in positions in MMGS III and SMGS IV can be filled up as follows.

Promotions under Merit Quota
60%


Promotions under Seniority Quota
40%


There will be no lateral entry for positions in MMGS III onwards and up to TEG VII (GM) level.

Very Important:
Where Rural/Semi-Urban Service and/or Managerial Experience has been made mandatory, as a pre-condition for promotion, managements have unfairly made it as a post-promotion condition in a large number of cases, suiting their whims and fancies.  Further, to add insult to the injury, the managements never bother to ensure that this post-promotion condition is complied with in full measure.  In order to avoid misuse of this clause, which works to the advantage of one section of officers and to the detriment of rest of them, it is now stipulated as follows.

“Where this pre-promotion condition is imposed on some promoted officers as a post-promotion condition, until and unless such officers complete the term of rural/semi-urban and managerial service as mandated for their latest promotion, their service will not be counted for earning the promotion to the next higher stage.  In other words, they will lose ‘inter se’ seniority.  Thus, certain section of officers will be thwarted from enjoying best of both the worlds (of complying with the mandatory pre-promotion requirement, after getting the promotion and simultaneously getting the benefit of seniority in the post-promotion Grade)”.

Date
12-06-2014                                                                                                                                                                                                   pannvalan