Friday, March 29, 2013

Bankers Are Doing Real Banking Or Acting As Commission Agent


TAKING BANKING ACTIVITY TO IDIOTIC LENGTHS


What is ‘Banking’?
As per Section 5(b) of Banking Regulation Act, 1949, ‘banking’ means the accepting, for the purpose of lending or investment, of deposits of money from the public, repayable on demand or otherwise and withdrawable by cheque, draft, order or otherwise. 

Here the core words are ‘accepting deposits, lending and investment’.

But how banking is interpreted today?

Many economists and seasoned bankers themselves believe all financial services are banking and shall be undertaken by a bank without any hesitation. It is totally a wrong perception.  Because of this wrong perception only, selling of gold, mutual funds, insurance policies and other financial services like investment banking, portfolio management, selling of financial and forex derivatives etc. have nowadays been considered an integral part of banking.  Due to these, the banks have lost their prime focus and started deviating from their core banking activity of accepting deposits and lending.

All financial transactions are not banking

Many bureaucrats in Ministry of Finance, top officials of RBI and CMDs and EDs of banks are under the mistaken notion that any monetary transaction may be included in banking service and banks may engage themselves in such activities, provided they are legal and profit making.  Everyone including the banks failed to see the distinction between finance and banking. In due course, the banks who must be the guardians and catalysts of an economy have started playing the role of a servant of all others in the society.  

While it is true that every financial transaction between two parties can be captured by a bank and reflected in its accounts books, the banks shall never aspire to initiate or receive each monetary transaction by themselves, even if instructed by others.

When both the parties to a money transaction remain mere witnesses, one bank executes it on behalf of its client and there is another bank to complete the other part of the same transaction. By doing this, the banks shoulder the risks of someone else.  By passing on the risks, responsibilities, concerns and potential losses to the banks, the real parties are merrily engaged in some other useful and leisurely activity.  This is the point where the banks have drifted from their course.  

Today, the emphasis is on fee based income

Now, we see banks selling gold, insurance policies, mutual funds, collection of government taxes etc. on one extreme.  On the other extreme, we also see banks engaged in selling of Tirupati Laddus, collection of school and college fees, undertaking ECS transactions for recovery of dues of private financial institutions, distribution of interest and dividends paid by the companies, payment of salaries to staff of government departments, educational institutions and private companies and payment of various types of pension to the beneficiaries, distribution of subsidies, aids and grants from the central and state governments and other unrelated activities like overseeing election duty and the like.  The latter category of tasks do not fetch any income or gains.
 
On the contrary, they demand a lot of time and energy of the bank staff.  Many of these functions have cleverly been thrust upon banks by others and the banks themselves voluntarily took up some of them.  

Bank managements do not unduly bother themselves about the impact of such activities on the precious human resources

Banks are made very happy by the pittance they receive in the form of fees, commission, incentives etc.  But, compared to the amount of such fees, commission or incentive received, the cost of human resources wasted on these jobs is enormous and irrecoverable.  Such routine activities do not offer any scope for creativity and self-accomplishment.  There is total drudgery in most of these activities and the bank staff are exposed to fatigue, boredom and continuous stress.  Even in their personal life outside their bank (assuming they have time for a personal life in reality), these staff become dull, monotonous, drab and absent-minded.

Banks have made themselves cheap 

In an anxiety to play as many roles as possible, banks have failed in their prime role.  Omnipresence itself has become the ‘Achilles’ heel’ of the banks in India.  Precisely due to this reason, bank staff have been reduced to nothing in today’s society.  They are no longer precious, respected and envied.  They have become so cheap, weak, vulnerable and defenceless that whosoever wants to insult and harm them can do so with total impunity.  They have become an easy and soft target for every segment of the society.  Alas, there is no unity among the bank staff today unlike in the past.  I don’t expect militancy, but unity and solidarity are necessary.

There is neither recognition nor sympathy

Because of the faulty course chosen by their managements, bank staff have to bear the brunt of the dissatisfied customers, superiors, regulatory bodies and law enforcing agencies.  The media is also very unkind to them, because of the false notion that all bank employees well paid.

When I was the Branch Manager of my bank at Ooty, I used to carry a brief case to the office every day and bring it back when I return home at the night.  There was a lady in the neighouring house.  One day, she asked my wife: “I have been observing that your husband carries brief case to the bank every day and promptly brings it back on his return.  What does he keep inside the brief case?  Does he bring home bundles of currency notes, everyday?”

Why I am quoting here is, even educated people in the society think that we bankers always roll in money!  Only God knows that it is only a banker who has the largest amount of debts!

Written by -       V Subramanian
Banks, NBFCs lose Rs 1.43 lakh cr worth market value in Q4--Economic Times


NEW DELHI: Witnessing a sharp value erosion in their scrips during the last quarter of the current fiscal, about 50 listed banks and NBFCs of the country have lost nearly Rs 1.43 lakh crore in their market capitalisation in this period.

The estimated 14 per cent percentage loss in the market value of banking and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) is much higher than the overall plunge of less than eight per cent across the stock market between January and March 2013.

While two days are still left in the current fiscal, the stock markets would now resume trading in the next financial year on April 1, as the next two days are trading holdings.

An analysis of stock movements of about 50 listed banks and NBFCs during the current quarter shows that their cumulative market cap has plunged by Rs 1,43,682 crore since January 1, 2013 to end the fiscal at Rs 10,44,400 crore.

The biggest loser among these has been state-run banking major SBI with a loss of over Rs 23,000 crore in the current quarter, followed by private lenders HDFC BankBSE 1.58 % and ICICI Bank with losses of over Rs 13,000 crore and Rs 12,000 crore, respectively.

Incidentally, this three-month period saw many significant developments regarding the banking and NBFC sectors. While RBI came out with its final guidelines for grant of new banking licenses, a sting operation also claimed major lapses regarding the money laundering controls at three leading private banks.

Besides, financial difficulties came to the fore at some of the NBFCs, including those in the business of gold loans. Also, a number of NBFCs expressed interest in applying for new bank licenses, directly or through their groups.

All the public sector banks and NBFCs together lost more than Rs 85,000 crore of market value, followed by a loss of over Rs 33,000 crore by the private banks and Rs 25,000 crore for the private sector NBFCs, during the last quarter.

No comments:

Post a Comment