Cabinet to soon consider holding company proposal for PSU banks
Press Trust of India | Updated On: January 16,
2013 19:19 (IST)
"We are moving to Cabinet for setting up a holding company for the public sector banks," said an official source.
"It will take 2-3 weeks. There will be one holding company for all public sector banks," sources said.
They said the Law Ministry's opinion has been sought for making legislative changes as various acts will have to be synchronised and amendments will be required in the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 and 1980.
Besides, State Bank of India Act 1955 and SBI Subsidiaries Act 1959 will have to be synchronised with the holding company structure.
"Law Ministry has to vet the proposal first. Then it will go to cabinet." the source said.
As per the structure proposed, 99 per cent of government holding in the bank will be shifted to the Holding Company and the government will retain 1 per cent with itself so that it remains a state-owned bank, sources said. The company can be managed by 3-4 part-time officials, they added.
The Budget 2012-13 had proposed the setting up of a financial holding company that would help raise resources to meet capital needs of state-owned banks. The Budget 2012-13 had proposed f creating a financial holding company to raise resources to meet the capital requirements of Public Sector Banks is under examination.
Law ministry opinion sought on banks’ holding company
If the cabinet approves, the holding company can be
operational from June
First Published: Wed, Jan
16 2013. 04 04 PM IST
The holding company has the approval of Reserve Bank of
Updated: Wed, Jan 16 2013. 09 46 PM IST livemint
The setting up of a holding company, with an aim to
recapitalise public sector banks, was announced in last year’s budget by then
finance minister Pranab
Mukherjee. The aim was to devise a mechanism to handle the growing
capital requirements of public sector banks without straining the finances of
the government. But it took some time for the model to be finalised as
questions were raised about its financial viability as well as the possibility
of increased risk since public sector banks account for nearly 75% of the
market.
“First, the principal concept has to be approved. Setting up
one holding company for all the public sector banks will require amendments to
a number of acts which govern banks. We have sought the law ministry’s opinion.
It should go to the cabinet in three-four weeks,” said a senior finance
ministry official who didn’t want to be identified.
If the cabinet approves, the holding company could be
operational from June and manage the capital requirements of banks from the next
fiscal, the official said. The holding company has the approval of Reserve Bank
of India ,
he added.
The finance ministry has estimated the state-owned banks’
capital requirement for the next fiscal at Rs20,000 crore. But the final amount
decided will be dependent on Planning Commission approval. Of this, around
Rs5,000 crore could be allocated to the holding company.
The government has infused more than Rs12,000 crore into
state-owned banks this fiscal.
To make the model viable, the holding company may borrow
from overseas markets at comparatively cheaper rates so that repayment problems
do not arise. The revenue model for the company would involve dividends paid by
banks.
Holding firm for public sector banks in offing
Bank recapitalisation will no longer be budget business
The government proposes to set up a financial holding
company (FHC) to take care of periodic capital infusion in public sector banks,
a top finance ministry official said.
Should the proposal go through, the government will transfer most of its equity in public sector banks to the holding company, which will, in turn, leverage its huge capital base to borrow overseas to meet the capital infusion requirement of public sector banks. PSU banks will require almost Rs 1.4 lakh crore of capital infusion in the next four-five years to meet Basel III norms.
The latest proposal follows recommendations in this regard by RBI-appointed Shyamala Gopinath working group.
Finance ministry is giving finishing touches to the proposal, which would go before the cabinet shortly. The main purpose of setting up a holding company is to ensure that the government does not have to make budget provisions any longer for recapitalisation of banks.
The holding company will also receive dividends, the official said, adding it can tap both debt and equity markets to raise capital. However, resources will have to be primarily raised through foreign borrowings, which would then be infused as equity in various state-owned banks.
The government has been infusing capital on a regular basis in PSU banks and this practice would have to be continued for few more years to meet the capital adequacy requirement as banks grow their business. The government has injected about Rs 32,000 crore in the past two years — Rs 20,157 crore in 2010-11 and Rs 12,000 crore in 2009-10. This financial year, it is injecting another Rs 12,517 crore.
Apart from Rs 3,000 crore capital infusion in State Bank ofIndia this financial year, it will also
recpitalise Indian Overseas Bank, Central Bank of India, Punjab National Bank, Punjab and Sind Bank, Uco Bank, Union Bank and Bank of
Maharashtra. Allocation for individual banks would be announced in the next few
days.
The official quoted earlier in this report, who did not want to be named, insisted that the holding company would not interfere in day-to-day functioning or operations of banks. The company would only raise money for capital infusion and apportion it to various public sector banks as per their requirements, so that the exchequer would no longer have to bother about making provisions in the budget, in managing which the government has been walking the tight rope in view of the difficult fiscal situation.
The Shyamala Gopinath working group had suggested that all new banks and insurance companies would have to mandatorily be operated under the financial holding company framework. There could be two holding companies, one each for banks and non-banking companies.
According to the group’s report submitted last May, all identified financial conglomerates having a bank within the group also need to convert to the FHC model in a time bound manner.
The group recommended a separate regulatory framework for FHCs and a new law for regulating FHCs. While the RBI should be designated as the regulator for FHCs, a separate unit within the apex bank should undertake the regulatory function with staff drawn both in-house and from other regulators. The group also recommended a consolidated supervision mechanism through memorandum of understanding between regulators.
On listing the holding company, the working group has recommended that requisite space needs to be provided to the holding company to raise capital for its subsidiaries.
Should the proposal go through, the government will transfer most of its equity in public sector banks to the holding company, which will, in turn, leverage its huge capital base to borrow overseas to meet the capital infusion requirement of public sector banks. PSU banks will require almost Rs 1.4 lakh crore of capital infusion in the next four-five years to meet Basel III norms.
The latest proposal follows recommendations in this regard by RBI-appointed Shyamala Gopinath working group.
Finance ministry is giving finishing touches to the proposal, which would go before the cabinet shortly. The main purpose of setting up a holding company is to ensure that the government does not have to make budget provisions any longer for recapitalisation of banks.
The holding company will also receive dividends, the official said, adding it can tap both debt and equity markets to raise capital. However, resources will have to be primarily raised through foreign borrowings, which would then be infused as equity in various state-owned banks.
The government has been infusing capital on a regular basis in PSU banks and this practice would have to be continued for few more years to meet the capital adequacy requirement as banks grow their business. The government has injected about Rs 32,000 crore in the past two years — Rs 20,157 crore in 2010-11 and Rs 12,000 crore in 2009-10. This financial year, it is injecting another Rs 12,517 crore.
Apart from Rs 3,000 crore capital infusion in State Bank of
The official quoted earlier in this report, who did not want to be named, insisted that the holding company would not interfere in day-to-day functioning or operations of banks. The company would only raise money for capital infusion and apportion it to various public sector banks as per their requirements, so that the exchequer would no longer have to bother about making provisions in the budget, in managing which the government has been walking the tight rope in view of the difficult fiscal situation.
The Shyamala Gopinath working group had suggested that all new banks and insurance companies would have to mandatorily be operated under the financial holding company framework. There could be two holding companies, one each for banks and non-banking companies.
According to the group’s report submitted last May, all identified financial conglomerates having a bank within the group also need to convert to the FHC model in a time bound manner.
The group recommended a separate regulatory framework for FHCs and a new law for regulating FHCs. While the RBI should be designated as the regulator for FHCs, a separate unit within the apex bank should undertake the regulatory function with staff drawn both in-house and from other regulators. The group also recommended a consolidated supervision mechanism through memorandum of understanding between regulators.
On listing the holding company, the working group has recommended that requisite space needs to be provided to the holding company to raise capital for its subsidiaries.
Centre mulls holding company for PSU banks business standared
The move comes after public sector banks submitted their capital requirement plans for the next eight-10 years, after taking into account the capital requirement under the new Basel-III framework. The government, which is keen on holding a minimum stake of 58 per cent in public sector banks, may find it difficult to infuse large sums of money, as this would affect the country's fiscal position.
Banking industry officials say by forming a holding
company, it would be possible to raise funds from the market, and the
government holding can be maintained at above 58 per cent.
In August, the government had sanctioned capital infusion of around Rs 2,000 crore in some public sector banks, to increase its stake to 58 per cent. It had earmarked Rs 6,000 crore for capital infusion in public sector banks, as announced during the Budget this year. Apart from maintaining 58 per cent stake, the government also wants to ensure public sector banks’ tier-I capital adequacy ratio be at least eight per cent. The regulatory requirement is six per cent, with an overall capital adequacy ratio of nine per cent. The government’s stake in large banks like Union Bank of Banks are expected to grow at 20-25 per cent over the next few years if economic growth stays around the trend growth rate of eight per cent. Bankers said retained profit would not be sufficient to support the capital requirements required to maintain decent growth. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Manojit
Saha / Mumbai Sep 30, 2011, 00:53 IST
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
The move comes after public sector banks submitted their capital requirement plans for the next eight-10 years, after taking into account the capital requirement under the new Basel-III framework. The government, which is keen on holding a minimum stake of 58 per cent in public sector banks, may find it difficult to infuse large sums of money, as this would affect the country's fiscal position.
Banking industry officials say by forming a holding
company, it would be possible to raise funds from the market, and the
government holding can be maintained at above 58 per cent.
HOLDING ON
Govt stake in some major public sector banks: |
|
State
Bank of India
|
59.40
|
Corporation
Bank
|
58.52
|
Dena
Bank
|
58.01
|
Allahabad
Bank
|
58.00
|
Andhra
Bank
|
58.00
|
Oriental
Bank
|
58.00
|
Punjab
National Bank
|
58.00
|
Vijaya
Bank
|
57.69
|
Union
Bank of
|
57.07
|
Bank
of
|
57.03
|
Source:
Capitaline
Compiled by BS Research Bureau |
In August, the government had sanctioned capital infusion of around Rs 2,000 crore in some public sector banks, to increase its stake to 58 per cent. It had earmarked Rs 6,000 crore for capital infusion in public sector banks, as announced during the Budget this year.
Apart from maintaining 58 per cent stake, the government also wants to ensure public sector banks’ tier-I capital adequacy ratio be at least eight per cent. The regulatory requirement is six per cent, with an overall capital adequacy ratio of nine per cent.
The government’s stake in large banks like Union Bank of
Banks are expected to grow at 20-25 per cent over the next few years if economic growth stays around the trend growth rate of eight per cent. Bankers said retained profit would not be sufficient to support the capital requirements required to maintain decent growth. SUUTI may become holding company for PSBs
Dheeraj Tiwari, ET Bureau Jul 16, 2012, 04.02AM IST
The union cabinet has already approved a proposal to wind up
SUUTI and shift
its assets to a new asset management company.
No comments:
Post a Comment