Wednesday, August 29, 2012

SBI Chairman Does Not Want to Change ,Retaliates On RBI


SBI chief Pratip Chaudhuri sticks to view on CRR

MUMBAIState Bank of India Chairman Pratip Chaudhuri on Tuesday reiterated his demand for abolishing the cash reserve ratio (CRR) requirement on banks, a day after his original plea was summarily rejected by a top central bank official.

Chaudhuri, who last week created a stir by saying CRRrequirement should be done away with as it was costing banks some Rs 21,000 crore in interest, played down the regulator's terse response to his comments, saying they had triggered a debate. "We have started a debate on CRR in the public domain, so let that debate happen," Chaudhuri told ET, when asked for his reaction to RBI deputy governor KC Chakrabarty's response to his demand.

"If the SBI chairman is not able to do the business in this regulatory environment, he has to find out some other place," Chakrabarty was quoted as saying on Monday. The RBI mandates that banks keep 4.75% of their deposits in cash with it, locking up as much as Rs 2.5 lakh crore, which does not earn any interest.

Chaudhuri, who has been a crusader against CRR, repeated his case that it served no purpose, especially since banks already had 23% of their deposits parked in government bonds as statutory liquidity ratio (SLR). This, he argued, was more than enough to safeguard depositors and lenders in times of a liquidity crunch, making high CRR unnecessary.

"Why not completely abolish CRR? What is the purpose of CRR: to prevent banks from going into insolvency. You have 23% SLR requirement, which you can't give as collateral to raise any loan. So how does a CRR of 4.75% help?" he asked. A cut in CRR, it is argued, could help bring down the cost of funds for banks, which can be passed on to customers, who are feeling the pinch of high lending rates.

"Like when they reduced CRR last time, all banks reduced rates in some form or the other — while some lowered base rates, some lowered their spread," said Chaudhuri. The RBI reduced CRR by 75 basis points in two phases since April, following which most banks lowered their base rate. SBI reduced the spread on retail loans and on loans to small businessmen. Chaudhuri's demand, however, does not have the unstinted support of his peers.

"I understand where he (Chaudhuri) is coming from, but I don't necessarily subscribe to his views," said S Raman, CMD of Canara Bank. "I don't think CRR can be completely abolished in India given the high level of inflation."

THURSDAY, MAY 10, 2012

All is Not Well In Government Banks

Loans to pharma companies turn bitter pill for banks
Loans of more than Rs 2,000 cr to Surya Pharma, Orchid Chem need restructuring
Manojit Saha / Mumbai Aug 15, 2012, 00:50 IST ( taken from newspaper Business Standard )
http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/loans-to-pharma-companies-turn-bitter-pill-for-banks/483322/

Loans to mid-sized pharmaceutical companies have turned bad for a slew of top public sector banks in the first quarter of this financial year. Some of the large lenders are set to restructure some of these, to avoid more slippage.

North India-based Surya Pharmaceutical Ltd, flagship company of the Rs 1,700-crore Surya Corp, defaulted to State Bank of India, Punjab National Bank, Bank of India and Oriental Bank of Commerce in the quarter.
 While SBI had an exposure of Rs 460 crore, the total in this account that has become a non-performing asset (NPA) is close to Rs 1,000 crore.http://dkjain497091112006.blogspot.in/2012/05/all-is-not-in-government-banks.html

THURSDAY, AUGUST 23, 2012


Uncalled For Suggestion for Banks Demanding Relaxation in NPA And Cash Reserve Ratio

SBI Wants Easier NPA Norms, NO CRR OR Interest on CRR, No SLR to Increase Profit ,More Lending AND Comfortable Survival --More Free Fund More Loot and More Freedom

SBI is silent how such large volume of NPA Accumulated? 

Who are responsible for concealment of NPA, for making lesser provisions and for inflating profit in the past decade or two?

Have they taken any action against erring top officials whose dirty policy for making their Balance Sheet attractive was in the same manner in which companies like Satyam Computers did?

Have they taken any action against bank officials who were involved in sanction of loans to bad business men and due to whose malicious intention the loan became bad and SBI suffered loss?

Have they punished any DGM or AGM or GM or CMD or ED for any of bad loan accounts because high values of loans are sanctioned only by top officials thought process at branch?

Ministry of Finance and Government of India acted against Satyam Computers to save Investors, but silent on Bankers who defrauded investors by their immoral and illegal acts?

MONDAY, AUGUST 6, 2012


How To Conceal NPA IS Still the Demand Of the Day


The need for stricter laws to report restructured loans

Collected from News Paper "The Economic Times"

It is just over a week since an RBI-appointed Expert Group called for an early end to the present smoke and mirrors system of estimating (obfuscating?) non-performing assets (NPA) numbers, euphemistically termed 'regulatory forbearance'.

Yet, far from heeding the Group's suggestion, the government is reportedly contemplating exactly the opposite. Faced with the prospect of drought in large parts of the country, it wants to continue the existing practice of regulatory forbearance. This would enable banks to restructure their short-term crop loans, particularly those made to small and marginal farmers, without classifying them 'non-performing.'

Under the existing guidelines, banks are required to set aside a certain amount of their profits as a cushion against the risk of default. Predictably, banks are required to set aside much more for sub-standard and doubtful or loss assets compared to standard assets since there is a greater probability that such loans will not be recovered.

SATURDAY, AUGUST 4, 2012


Government bank May Survive Only If They Become Fully Private


RBI's Subbarao: Indian Government May Have to Change Public Sector Banking Structure




No comments:

Post a Comment